This post is under construction.
See the previous post in this series for context and content of the following post, or the bottom of the first in the series for a table of contents.
Symmetric sequences, operads, and free functors
Let \(\Sigma\) denote the groupoid \(\Sigma := \coprod_{n \in \NN} \Sigma_n\); this is equivalent to the core of the category of finite sets.
Definition 6.Fix \(\cC\) a cocomplete symmetric monoidal closed category.
The *category of symmetric sequences in \(\cC\) is the functor category \(\cC^\Sigma\).
These possess a symmetric monoidal product called the *composition product, computed on objects by
We could have equivalently replaced \(\Sigma\) with \(\mathbf{Fin}^{\simeq}\);
we use the skeleton for the sake of the notation \(\cO(n)\).
I’ll cut to the chase;
there is a free forgetful adjunction between pointed symmetric sequences and operads, given by the free monoid construction with respect to \(\circ\).
There’s likewise a free-forgetful adjunction between symmetric sequences and left-modules over a given operad, as well as right-modules.
Left-modules are a generalization of algebras, which are precisely left modules concentrated in degree 0.
If we view the weight grading of a symmetric sequence \(X_\bullet\) as being the “number of elements,” then we may view right-modules over \(\cO\) as an algebraic structure wherein, given an element of \(X_\bullet\) with \(n\) elements, and \(n\) elements of \(\cO\) with \(n_1,\dots,n_k\) elements, we produce an element of \(X_\bullet\) with \(\sum_i n_i\) elements.
We use this perspective to formalize toroidal composition.
But first, we sketch the notion of a operadic congruence generated by a sub-symmetric sequences.
Congruences, quotients, and operads
This section will be far from self contained.
Let \(\cC\) be a finitely complete category.
A congruence on $$X$$</a> is an equivalence relation on $$X$$ internal to $$\cC$$;
in particular, such a thing is a subobject $$R \hookrightarrow X \times X$$, which yields a parallel pair $$R \rightrightarrows X$$ by composing with the right and left projection.
Note that the condition of internal reflexivity is precisely that there exists a common section $$\Delta:X \rightarrow R \rightrightarrows X$$.
The quotient \(X / R\) is, if it exists, the coequalizer of the diagram \(R \rightrightarrows X\).
In particular, any morphism \(S \rightarrow X\) has a kernel pair, defined as the pullback of the cospan \(S \rightarrow X \leftarrow S\), and this supports the structure of a congruence.
If all quotients exist for kernel pairs, then every coequalizer is expressed as the quotient of its kernel pair;
this is a nonabelian version of the axiom in abelian category that cokernels of kernels agree with kernels of cokernels.
If in fact the morphism property of being a coequalizer of some parallel pair is pullback-stable, then \(\cC\) is called regular;
regular categories are the categories with pullback-stable image factorizations, yielding a form of the first isomorphism theorem:
every morphism \(f:X \rightarrow Y\) factors canonically as a coequalizer followed by a monomorphism.
Claim. Let \(G \hookrightarrow X \times X\) be a subobject, for \(X\) a monoid.
Then, the poset \(P\) of congruences on \(X\) containing \(G\) (ordered by containment) has a unique minimal element.
It suffices to prove that \(P\) is cofiltered and its opposite poset satisfies the conditions of Zorn’s lemma.
In fact, we can prove a stronger condition:
we show that \(P\) has arbitrary nonempty limits, i.e. it has arbitrary nonempty intersections.
Toroidal composition
There are symmetric sequences \(A^\vee\) of atoroidal toroidal weaves, \(A^{\Sym}\) of atoroidal weaves, \(W^\vee\) of toroidal weaves, and \(W^{\Sym}\) of weaves, in sets.
Toroidal composition provides two maps of symmetric sequences:
We’d like to realize the first as the composition map of an operad, and the second as a structure map of an operadic right module.
To do the first, we need to choice a unit.
This is not too hard:
Proposition 1. \(\cW^{\vee}(1)\) is contractible;
that is, there is a contractible space of one-component toroidal weaves.
To prove this, note that there is a deformation retract of \(\cW^{\vee}(1)\) onto the realization given by the core curve of the solid torus;
this is a translation followed by a rotation.
Let \(\eta \in \Hom(\cO_{\operatorname{triv}}, W^\vee) \simeq W^{\vee}(1) \simeq *\) be the for \(W^\vee\).
Proposition 2.
The maps \(\mu^\vee, \eta\) endow on \(W^{\vee}\) the structure of an operad.
This is more-or-less obvious, so I’ll skip it.
The following proposition is also obvious, and I’ll also skip it
Proposition 3.
The map \(\mu\) endows \(W^{\Sym}\) with the structure of a right module over \(W^\vee\).
These summarize the existence of algebraic structure on weaves;
there’s both an operadic composition within toroidal weaves, and an operadic right-action of toroidal weaves on weaves.
We next describe toroidal decomposition, which amounts to giving presentations of \(W\) and \(W^\vee\) as quotients of free objects.
Toroidal decomposition
Note that \(\cA^\vee\) is contractible by Proposition 1, so \(A^\vee\) is uniquely pointed.
There is a free operad \(\Fr_{\Op}\prn{A^\vee}\) on \(A^\vee\) as a pointed object;
this is the operad parameterizing trees labelled with atoroidal toroidal weaves, modulo the one-component weave \(O\) acting as unit.
The operad structure on \(W^\vee\) is given by a structure map \(\Fr_{\Op}\prn{W^\vee} \rightarrow W^\vee\).
This induces a map
In the other direction, the previous discussion of toroidal decomposition yields a map of operads \(W^\vee \rightarrow \Fr_{\Op}\prn{A^\vee}\), after choosing a (non-canonical) decomposition of each fully toroidal weave into a tree of 2-component weaves.
We’d like to realize these as maps within a split coequalizer diagram in operads;
to do so, we need the technology of operadic congruence envelopes.
TODO: put discussion of operadic congruence envelopes here.
Now, let \(r^\vee_{M} \in \Fr_{\Op}\prn{A^\vee}^{\times 2}\) be the relation between the two realizations of \(M_3\) within \(\Fr_{\Op}\prn{A^\vee}\);
these are both trees of height 2 with one leaf node \(M_2\) and the other \(O\), with the first making one choice of position for the \(M_2\) and the other making the other.
Similarly, let \(r^\vee_O \in \Fr{|Op}\prn{A^\vee}^{\times 2}\) be the relation between the two realizations of \(3 \cdot O\).
Toroidal decomposition for toroidal weaves can be phrased as follows:
is split by toroidal decomposition;
hence \(\cW^\vee\) is the quotient of the operad of trees labelled by \(A^\vee\) by the realizations of \(M_3\) and \(3 \cdot O\).
Similarly, note that \(A \circ W^\vee\) is the free right \(W^\vee\)-module on \(A\).
Let \(r_M\) and \(r_0\) be the relations in \(A \circ W^\vee\) corresponding with the realizations of \(M_3\) and \(3 \cdot O\).
Toroidal decomposition for weaves can be phrased as follows:
Theorem 5.
The right \(W^\vee\)-module cofork diagram
$$\langle r_M, r_O \rangle \rightrightarrows A \circ W^\vee \rightarrow W^\Sym$$
is split by toroidal decomposition;
hence \(W^{\Sym}\) arises by affixing a single atoroidal weave to a toroidal weave, modulo the pairs of such decompositions for \(M_3\) and \(3 \cdot O\).
We then may pass from \(W^{\Sym}\) to \(W\) by taking \(\Sigma\)-orbits.
The various functors employed in this construction are summarized in the following chart:
This illustration is color coded for clarity; red describes the free operad construction, green the free module construction, orange the structure of toroidal weaves, and blue the structure of weaves. Each cofork diagram is a (split) coequalizer.